Documentation / Modules
Compliance
Frameworks with evidence collected rather than asserted, and a control with no automatable evidence marked manual.
Evidence, not checkboxes
Controls map to evidence the platform can collect — patch state, MFA coverage, backup verification, access reviews, log retention. Each carries when it was last established and by what.
A control with no automatable evidence is MANUAL and requires human attestation. It is never auto-passed, and a framework showing all-green where a third is manual is a framework nobody should trust.
Unverifiable is not compliant
Where a source was unreachable during a window, the affected controls report could not verify, with the window named — never compliant, never non-compliant, and never carried forward from the last check.
Genie never concludes compliance
He reports control status and the evidence behind it. He never states that a client is compliant, attests a control, or gives legal advice on a framework. That is a legal representation and it needs a person.
The EU AI Act
Article 50 requires disclosure that you are interacting with an AI system. That is our obligation as the provider, it took effect on 2 August 2026, and it cannot be delegated to you in a licence agreement.
Content Genie generates carries machine-readable marking. The platform's own decision log, approval gates and audit trail are collectable as evidence.
Not running it yet? Start a thirty-day evaluation — read-only, on your own estate, no card.
Thirty days · read-only · no card
Run it beside what you already have, against your real clients. It tells you what your tools are reporting that is not true.